Rapid tests for chlamydia and gonorrhea are unreliable and can give incorrect results, according to senior physicians. Home tests that need to be sent in for results, as well as consulting a doctor, are far better alternatives, they believe.

Senior physicians are sceptical of rapid tests for chlamydia

Sexually transmitted infections are on the rise among teenagers, with many opting to purchase rapid tests online or in stores. However, several senior physicians are critical of these tests.

Published

“There are numerous disreputable providers selling rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections online. These are neither approved nor safe to use,” senior physician Anne Olaug Olsen at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health’s Section for Respiratory, Bloodborne, and Sexually Transmitted Infections told Norwegian newspaper VG.

Chlamydia is the most widespread sexually transmitted infection in Norway, with 28,000 people infected annually. The spread of gonorrhea has also significantly increased in recent years, the newspaper reports. At the same time, the numbers show that more and more people are getting tested for these infections.

There are several home tests where you send in the sample for analysis, but it is not these that Olsen is primarily concerned with. The problem lies with the rapid tests that promise results in just a few minutes.

“Rapid tests for chlamydia are not reliable because they can give false-negative results. This creates a false sense of security and is a waste of money,” she says.

She is supported by senior physician Åse Haugstvedt from the Olafia Clinic, which advises on, tests for, and treats sexually transmitted infections.

“If you receive a positive result from a rapid test, you still need to see a doctor for further testing and treatment. If the person is experiencing symptoms, they should rather seek medical help quickly to prevent complications or uncover a serious illness,” she says.

———

Read the Norwegian version of this article on forskning.no

Powered by Labrador CMS