Share your science:

Social media “likes” and comments lead to poorer self-esteem

SHARE YOUR SCIENCE: Girls who “like” and comment on what others post on social media develop a worse self-image over time. Posting on your own profile doesn’t have the same effect.

Published

Almost all young people use social media, and the visual communication is what counts. The activity is all about “selfies”, photos and videos – and what kind of “likes,” comments and reply posts they generate. Social media has become an important arena for showing off and comparing yourself with others. How does this affect the self-image of children and teens? Is it harmful? Can it lead to better self-esteem?

Using data from the Trondheim Early Secure Study, we sought to answer these questions with a spotlight on assessing one’s own appearance (physical self-image). Young people’s assessment of their own appearance is of great importance for their overall self-image.

The study in brief:

  • Social media is characterized by visual communication and is an important arena for “showing who you are.”
  • The self-presentations on social media are often “perfect,” retouched representations and can thus create an appearance norm that few attain.
  • The gap between the norm and the assessment of one’s own appearance can lead to lower self-esteem, but “likes” and comments can potentially also boost self-image.

We interviewed over 700 participants when they were 10, 12 and 14 years old and found the following:

  • Girls who “like” and comment on other people’s posts (“other-oriented” social media use) get poorer physical self-image over time. For the boys, it didn’t matter.
  • Posting on your own social media page (“self-oriented” use) does not affect physical self-image.

Trondheim Early Secure Study

The Trondheim Early Secure Study is a research project that studies the psychological and social development of children and adolescents. Researchers have obtained information from parents, kindergarten staff, teachers since the children were 4 years old and from the children themselves since they were 8 years old. The participants are now 16 years old, and the seventh data collection survey is ongoing.

Children were interviewed about social media use from the age of 10. Self-image was measured using a questionnaire. Over 40 per cent reported using Instagram and Snapchat when they were 10 years old. Two years later, those numbers had doubled. When the participants were 14 years old, about 95 per cent were on Facebook, and 70-80 per cent used Instagram and Snapchat (see table).

What’s new?

Studies that have looked at the relation between social media use and self-image have reported some conflicting findings. This may be because the type of social media use that has been investigated has not been specified. In our study, we therefore distinguish between what we call “self-oriented” versus “other-oriented” social media use.

  • Take Lise, for instance. She constantly posts photos of herself on Instagram (“self-oriented” use), gets a lot of “likes” and comments, which can potentially boost her self-image.
  • Frida, on the other hand, is more inclined to “like” and comment on other people’s Instagram photos (“other-oriented” use). Given that selfies are usually “retouched” and “perfect” representations, Frida is constantly exposed to other people’s idealized self-portraits. The discrepancy between what Frida perceives as the norm and how she judges herself can be great, and damaging to her own self-image.

That’s what we thought. And yes, the findings indicate that girls who over time increasingly “like” and comment others’ posts, develop a poorer physical self-image. But people like Lise do not develop a better self-image from posting pictures of themselves. Self-oriented use also does not help to “protect” them against the negative effect of other-oriented use.

Posting on own profile has no effect

It’s conceivable that the positive feedback Lise receives when she posts a picture or a text has an immediate, positive effect on her self-image, but this effect is very short-lived.

Note that we investigated how social media use affected physical self-image two years later. Although studies show that most people get positive comments on what they post, some get negative comments or no comments or “likes”. This can negatively affect their self-image.

Future studies can look at this more closely by mapping what feedback the participants receive and whether it can explain the relation between social media use and self-image.

We also hypothesized that people with good physical self-esteem are more likely to post on their profiles than those who are not so happy with their own appearance, but we didn’t find support for this in our findings.

Why do the findings only apply to girls?

The relation between other-oriented social media use and poorer physical self-image was strong for girls, but no such link showed up for boys. Why might that be?

Research shows that women are more likely than men to use social media to compare themselves to others (Haferkamp, Eimler, Papadakis, & Kruck, 2012). Social comparison also has a stronger negative effect on women’s body image than it does on men’s body image (Myers & Crowther, 2009). These findings may explain some of the difference.

Our study did not investigate why other-oriented social media use negatively affects physical self-image or why it only applies to girls. However, we will continue to follow the participants in Trondheim Early Secure Study and thus hope to be able to contribute to a greater understanding about how social media use affects children and youth.

References:

The impact of social media use on appearance self-esteem from childhood to adolescence – A 3-wave community study. Silje Steinsbekk, Lars Wichstrøm,, Frode Stenseng, Jacqueline Nesi, Beate Wold Hygen, Věra Skalická.

Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A. M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus? Examining Gender Differences in Self-Presentation on Social Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0151

Note: This article was first published in Aftenposten Viten on 25 August 2020.

Share your science or have an opinion in the Researchers' zone

The ScienceNorway Researchers' zone consists of opinions, blogs and popular science pieces written by researchers and scientists from or based in Norway.
Want to contribute? Send us an email!

Powered by Labrador CMS